|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSeparate from the actual script, what are the considerations for special populations such as young women, new mothers, older women, women with disabilities, and LGBTQ+ individuals? Provide health maintenance guidelines that should be included during the initial and follow up assessments. (i.e., bone density test, pap smear, Gardasil (HPV) vaccine, shingles, etc.)?
|
|
30 to >26.7 pts
Excellent
The response provides clear, complete, and all appropriate special considerations. Health maintenance guidelines are clear and complete.
|
26.7 to >23.7 pts
Good
The response provides clear, complete, and most of the special considerations. Most health maintenance guidelines are included and appropriate.
|
23.7 to >20.7 pts
Fair
The response provides special considerations but are incomplete, vague or inaccurate. Health maintenance guidelines are somewhat complete or inappropriate applied.
|
20.7 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides unclear, incomplete, or inappropriate components . The special considerations and the maintenance guidelines are missing, incorrect, or inappropriate applied.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBuilding a Health History: Asking Difficult Questions. Create your own script for building a health history. Consider the type of language you would use to help your patient be more comfortable). Ensure you include the difficult questions required to complete a thorough health history.
|
|
25 to >22.3 pts
Excellent
The script contains a complete set of questions, including difficult questions, necessary to build a health history. Questions are phrased in a manner that supports the patients comfort.
|
22.3 to >19.75 pts
Good
The script contains a mostly complete set of questions, including difficult questions, necessary to build a health history. Most questions are phrased in a manner that supports the patients comfort.
|
19.75 to >17.25 pts
Fair
The script containing some relevant questions, including a few difficult questions. Information collected provides a cursory health history. Questions are not phrased in a supportive tone.
|
17.25 to >0 pts
Poor
The script contains few or no relevant questions, including few or no difficult questions. Information collected is not sufficient to provide an adequate health history. Questions are not phrased in a supportive tone.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn addition to your script for building a health history for this assignment, include a separate section called “Reflection." Provide a brief overview of the 5 areas of SDOH for this patient and the questions you would consider. Briefly reflect and provide a summary of your experiences in developing your script during your health history.
|
|
30 to >26.7 pts
Excellent
The response provides information on the SDOH and an accurate, clear, and complete summary of experiences in developing the script during the health history.
|
26.7 to >23.7 pts
Good
The response provides information on the SDOH and an accurate summary of experiences in developing the script during the health history.
|
23.7 to >20.7 pts
Fair
The response provides vague information on the SDOH and a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary of the experiences in developing the script during the health history.
|
20.7 to >0 pts
Poor
The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete SDOH and summary of the experiences in developing the script during the health history, or the summary is missing.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
|
5 to >4.45 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
4.45 to >3.95 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
|
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
|
3.45 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.45 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4.45 to >3.95 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3.45 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
|
5 to >4.45 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4.45 to >3.95 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
|
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
|
3.45 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
