MSN-FPX 6111 Assessment 3

Course Evaluation Template

Name 

Institution 

Course 

Instructor 

Date 

Course Evaluation Template

Course Title: _ Enhancing Cultural Competence in Nursing Practice_______________________________________________________

Date: __________________________

Faculty: ________________________

Instructions: Answering the following questions will help us gather your input. We really appreciate your feedback, which will be used to enhance the course for students in the future. Use the following scale:

1 = Strongly Disagree
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree

Assumptions

1. The level of cultural competency that teachers strive to instill in their students is proportional to the quality of the education they provide.
2. The reliability and practicality of student assessments are guaranteed by standardized course goals.
3. Competence with technology for disease detection, prevention, and treatment is evaluated in three areas: cognition, psychomotor skills, and emotional regulation.

Criteria Evaluation Format: By use the Likert scale, we may assess the program's performance in relation to its stated goals. It guarantees reliable data for improving instruction by enabling the comparison of expected educational results with actual changes in student attitudes, knowledge, and skills (Ponsiglione et al., 2022).

Online Capella Assignment Writing Company

Validity and Reliability of Evaluation Methods: A Likert scale evaluation, which incorporates both open-ended and closed-ended questions, has strong validity and a reliability rate of 94% (Baburajan et al., 2020). The data collected via this approach contributes to accurate evaluations because of its great reliability.

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Likert Scale: Strengths: The program is straightforward and easy to use, the response options are easily visible, and data collecting is fast. Weaknesses: Challenges in effectively managing replies that are neither positive nor negative, as well as the possibility of prejudice from the participants (Taherdoost, 2019).

Executive Summary

The review mainly seeks to assess the efficacy of "Enhancing Cultural Competence in Nursing Practice" in attaining its stated goals of fostering cultural sensitivity and inclusivity in nursing care. This technique utilizes a Likert scale-based evaluation paradigm, which is tightly aligned with the course objectives and program outcomes. It enables a thorough assessment across the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains.

Methodologically, the evaluation utilizes the Likert Scale methodology to systematically evaluate the degree of cultural competence integration in several facets of the course, such as course content, faculty support, practical implementation in clinical settings, and its impact on nursing practice. This comprehensive approach ensures a comprehensive evaluation that accurately quantifies the attainment of educational goals.

Validity and reliability are ensured through long-lasting quality, the evaluation employs a blend of quantitative and qualitative assessment methods, including both open-ended and closed-ended inquiries. The evaluation exhibits a significant reliability rate of 94%, so enhancing the strong validity of the chosen methodology and fostering confidence.

This evaluation framework adheres to a predetermined set of criteria and concentrates on appraising the learner's viewpoint. It offers valuable insights about the extent to which the course fulfills certain learning objectives. The use of the multi-dimensional evaluation approach not only facilitates ongoing advancement, but also ensures that nursing education aligns with the cultural competence objectives set out in healthcare.

This assessment offers a thorough analysis of the course's influence on enhancing cultural competency in nursing practice. This is accomplished by integrating several evaluation methodologies and considering both quantitative and qualitative data. The review also highlights the significance of ongoing development and adaptation to evolving healthcare requirements.

References

Baburajan, V., e Silva, J. D. A., & Pereira, F. C. (2020). Open-ended versus closed-ended responses: a comparison study using topic modeling and factor analysis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(4), 2123-2132. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3040904. 

Ponsiglione, A. M., Amato, F., Cozzolino, S., Russo, G., Romano, M., & Improta, G. (2022). A hybrid analytic hierarchy process and likert scale approach for the quality assessment of medical education programs. Mathematics, 10(9), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091426 

Taherdoost, H. (2019). What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. Hamed Taherdoost, 1-10. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3588604 

Also Read: Nursfpx Assignment Writers