FPX6026 Assessment 1
Analysis of Position for Vulnerable Populations
Name
School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Capella University
Course
Instructor
Date
Analysis of Position for Vulnerable Populations
For military officers to get mental health care, they must be treated with respect, provided with more focus, and exposed to inventive methodologies. Troops continue to confront a range of mental health issues, including suicide, drug abuse, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Their personnel often have mental health challenges because of the nature of their career, which requires extensive healthcare coverage and expert therapy (Forbes et al., 2019). In order to effectively handle the multitude of thoughts and information, we need a thorough and demanding technique. Proponents of the present state of the VA healthcare system highlight the importance of the current institutions. Advocates for systemic changes and improvements make their position. In order to ensure that our troops get the necessary assistance for their mental well-being, we must devise strategies to overcome these challenges—conflicting perspectives.
Position with Regard to Health Outcomes for PTSD and Military Veterans
Immediate action is required to address the health concerns of soldiers, especially those pertaining to community mental health. Veterans suffering from mental health disorders, such as PTSD, depression, anxiety, or drug abuse, may get assistance. Militaries are more likely to have these problems because of the unique challenges, hardships, and environments they serve. Mental health affects a soldier's social well-being, creativity, and enjoyment. Because of this, it is essential to take care of their mental health. Our current mental health care system cannot meet the needs of our nation's armed troops. Unfortunately, some veterans still encounter obstacles when trying to get the mental health care they need, no matter how much the VA tries to help. Veterans are unable to get mental health care due to a multitude of factors, including social stigma, insufficient funding, and bureaucratic red tape (Forbes et al., 2019). The lack of access to mental health therapy compounds the severe problems of substance abuse, homelessness, and suicide that veterans face.
If mental health examinations, early prevention initiatives, and advice were more easily accessible to veterans, they may benefit more from treatment. Regular medical exams should include a mental health screening, and veterans seeking treatment for mental health issues should no longer face stigma and discrimination (Roscoe, 2021). Our nation's heroes require our simultaneous attention to these issues if we are to aid in their recovery after battle. This is due to the fact that familial, societal, and economic factors have a significant impact on soldiers' psychological well-being. Immediate action is required to reduce the expenses associated with untreated mental health issues and to begin honoring our heroes. By recognizing the immense value of veterans' service to the country and guaranteeing they have access to sufficient mental healthcare, we can better assist them in adjusting to civilian life, contributing to society, and improving their health.
Role of the Interprofessional Team in Facilitating Improvements
Patients receiving mental health care from interdisciplinary teams may have better results from their treatments. The military accomplishes its multiple objectives by bringing together specialists from several domains. For optimal mental health treatment, a multidisciplinary team of experts is required. All those who operate in the fields of physical and psychological health, as well as social work and public administration, are included under this category. Multidisciplinary teams are crucial in addressing the mental health concerns of soldiers. Specialists in the area of mental disease have devoted a great deal of time and energy to the subject. Because of her ability to assess patients, organize treatment, and be accessible at all times, nurses play an essential role in military healthcare. It is the social worker's vital duty to look out for the welfare of veterans. While advocating for veterans' rights and needs, they assist them in obtaining necessary assistance, locating local resources, and escaping financially harmful conditions. Trained experts provide counseling services to provide emotional support and offer informed advice. Community outreach professionals are essential in creating contacts that facilitate the provision of critical support to military members.
Taking a multidisciplinary approach could help troops' mental health in many ways. In order to fully understand the requirements of military personnel, it is necessary to consider the environmental, social, psychological, and physiological factors. Harada et al. (2023) suggest that if all parties involved cooperate, patients may get thorough evaluations, well-coordinated treatment plans, and a uniform standard of care throughout all healthcare institutions. Reducing the time it takes to produce tailored programming for veterans and shortening the duration of operations, this strategy improves communication and ensures a unified treatment plan. In order to tackle the wide range of mental health challenges that service members encounter, it is essential to establish multidisciplinary teams. Patients often benefit from the use of interdisciplinary teams when dealing with complex mental health issues. Working together, specialists may significantly improve the treatment's effectiveness for the soldiers.
Evidence and Positions that Support the Approach
Hefner & Rosenheck's (2019) research suggests that veterans suffering from PTSD or a comparable ailment should have access to comprehensive and timely medical treatment. The warriors' confidence in their health was boosted after they visited the doctor. Most individuals felt much better by the time they returned home. Helping military personnel who suffer from PTSD or substance misuse should be accessible, according to one research. The most effective strategy for increasing the speed with which narcotics reached the soldiers was to bring together individuals from diverse regions. Experts, nurses, and doctors collaborated to aid the soldiers more quickly. By achieving this objective, a more knowledgeable staff will be able to provide better care to the soldiers. Members of many communities may come together to aid veterinarians struggling with mental health issues.
Also Read: NURSFPX Best Nursing Academic Writing Services
There is substantial evidence indicating that a significant number of Vietnam and Iraq War veterans either received insufficient medical care or experienced a deterioration in their health as a result of this. The escalating healthcare expenditure issue is causing a cascading impact, jeopardizing the well-being of military personnel (Derefinko et al., 2019). The findings support the notion that veterans should be granted government-subsidized or perhaps cost-free healthcare. The main inference is that veterans, especially those grappling with PTSD and related problems, need prompt availability to healthcare interventions that include many disciplines. They laid the groundwork by highlighting the correlation between veterans' improved health outcomes and their ability to get free or low-cost medical care. The above statistics make it quite evident that veterans need both more recognition for their service and better healthcare.
Evidence and Positions Contrary to the Approach
According to some governmental and scientific perspectives, the current mental health care system for veterans does not need substantial modifications. Modifications may not be required if existing programs and treatments effectively meet the mental health requirements of veterans (Rosenthal et al., 2021). This viewpoint contends that the VA healthcare system and veteran support organizations adeptly cater to the mental health requirements of veterans. Significant modifications to the structure may not be necessary to accomplish these goals. The IVMF policy brief substantiates this assertion by highlighting the challenge of attaining consensus on a resolution. The research argues that while it recognizes the need for change and values the experiences of veterans, it asserts that individual solutions are more effective than institutional ones.
One key distinction is both advocates and detractors of military mental health treatment are aware of the efficacy of many current programs and agree that drastic modifications should be handled with caution. It is essential to highlight the achievements of these initiatives as well as the ongoing systemic issues. The argument for reform must be based on evidence that the status quo fails to address the unique healthcare requirements of service members and that they encounter obstacles when attempting to get necessary medical treatment. By recognizing the significance of the existing approaches and striving to make them entirely different, we may significantly improve the mental health treatment that troops get. Our system can last longer and do better if more ideas are accepted in this manner.
By considering many perspectives and research findings, the present discussion seeks to improve soldiers' mental health treatment. You must be aware of its origins in order to grasp the current VA healthcare system entirely. Additionally, it is critical to back and promote certain medications and finish treatment regimens that recognize and appreciate the individual experiences of service members. Despite encountering several challenges, the provision of mental health care for veterans has achieved notable advancements. In order to guarantee that veterans get personalized and comprehensive treatment, it is essential to use a diverse approach that addresses shortcomings and integrates efficient procedures. The brave citizens of our nation are confronting mental health issues. By a comprehensive analysis of all factors, we can develop a plan that leverages previous achievements while addressing new challenges.
References
Derefinko, K. J., Hallsell, T. A., Isaacs, M. B., Colvin, L. W., Salgado Garcia, F. I., & Bursac, Z. (2019). Perceived needs of veterans transitioning from the military to civilian life. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 46, 384-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-018-9633-8
Forbes, D., Pedlar, D., Adler, A. B., Bennett, C., Bryant, R., Busuttil, W., ... & Wessely, S. (2019). Treatment of military-related post-traumatic stress disorder: challenges, innovations, and the way forward. International Review of Psychiatry, 31(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2019.1595545
Harada, N. D., Traylor, L., Rugen, K. W., Bowen, J. L., Smith, C. S., Felker, B., ... & Gilman, S. C. (2023). Interprofessional transformation of clinical education: the first six years of the Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education. Journal of interprofessional care, 37(sup1), S86-S94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1433642
Hefner, K., & Rosenheck, R. (2019). Multimorbidity among veterans diagnosed with PTSD in the Veterans Health Administration nationally. Psychiatric Quarterly, 90(2), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-019-09632-5
Roscoe, R. A. (2021). The battle against mental health stigma: Examining how veterans with PTSD communicatively manage stigma. Health Communication, 36(11), 1378-1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1754587
Rosen, C. S., Morland, L. A., Glassman, L. H., Marx, B. P., Weaver, K., Smith, C. A., ... & Schnurr, P. P. (2021). Virtual mental health care in the Veterans Health Administration’s immediate response to coronavirus disease-19. American Psychologist, 76(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000751
Also Read: Flexpath Writing Service
